Showing posts with label Internet Scams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet Scams. Show all posts

Friday, August 31, 2012

Identity Theft Crimes

First, I didn't even notice the milestone on August 21.  It has been a year since this blog began.  It has been a learning experience to see how this works.  At first, you hope one person comes to the site, then two, then ten and you check every five minutes.  Now, I just check every ten minutes.  Thank you to the tens of thousands of visitors in the first year.  Please keep visiting, commenting, and emailing.

Now, to the meat of the post.  What is identity theft?  Is it forging a check in someone else's name?  Is it stealing someone's credit card and using it?  Is it just pretending to be someone else?

Identity theft crimes fall into the category of white collar crimes.  These are crimes that are financially motivated and generally non-violent.  We usually think of an employee embezzling funds from a company when we think of white collar crimes.  Today most of these crimes are identity theft.  It's on the rise and more and more people will be victims in their lifetime.  Just like me.  It leads to lost money, lost time spent dealing with the problem, and possibly ruining your credit.  In 2008, an estimated 11.7 million people were victims according to the Department of Justice.

Article 190 of the New York State Penal Law contains many of the fraud crimes related to identity theft.  The crimes range from issuing a bad check (writing a check the issuer knows will bounce) to usury (outrageous loan practices) to possessing a skimmer (a device used to obtain another's credit card information without their knowledge or consent).  It also defines identity theft.

Identity theft is when a person "knowingly and with intent to defraud assumes the identity of another person by presenting himself or herself as that other person, or by acting as that other person or by using personal identifying information of that other person, and thereby: (1) obtains goods, money, property or services or uses credit in the names of such other persons or causes financial loss to such person or another..."  P.L. Section 190.78.  The punishment ranges from a misdemeanor through a "D" Felony, depending on how much money was involved and whether the person has a prior conviction for a similar crime.

Seems simple.  Someone pretends to be me and uses my info to gain a benefit for themselves.  But how do we prove it?  Imagine this recent scenario.  A mother is on her deathbed.  She has three children.  One of the children lived with the mother in her years of decline and was allowed to use her mother's credit card in the past to help her obtain groceries and other products.  But now the mother is incapacitated with a disease that affects her physicaly and mentally.  The day before the mother dies, the adult child goes to a store and charges $20,000 worth of credit.  Now this has to be paid from her estate and understandably it seems wrong.  But how can we ever prove she did not have permission to use the card from the mother when the mother had capacity?

What about what happened to me?  Some person in another state gets my debit card info and uses it at a hotel.  We can get the surveillance videos from the hotel and the signature card.  Then we find the person and interview.  Get a search warrant for the home and computer.  If the evidence is there, we can arrest and prosecute. 

But what if that person had used my information at Amazon.com?  We can find the IP address that made the purchase, but we can never say with certainty who made the actual purchase.  We can never say who the person was sitting at the computer that day using the card.  Anyone in the house could have used the computer.

The prosecution of these cases is difficult.  We can only make arrests on cases in which there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense.  To do that we need evidence.  As we know from every major scandal, stolen money is an emotionally driven crime.  People want someone held accountable.  They don't want to hear that we don't have enough evidence.  Even if we all agree who did it, that doesn't mean we can charge him without admissible evidence.  Like any case, we must balance the victim's wishes with the evidence.  Embezzlement crimes are simpler.  There is always a paper trail of missing or stolen money that will lead to the person who stole it.     

So to the person in Michigan who spent two days being me, the investigation is underway.  The bad thing about the internet for prosecutors is that it is difficult to know who was at the keyboard at a given time.  The good thing?  Someone always leave a trail.  Did you?

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

A Stolen Identity

There are two telephone calls you do not want to receive on vacation - 1) that someone was sick or hurt, or 2) that someone stole your identity.

Last week, some NASCAR loving soul pretended to be Prosecutor's Discretion for a few days.  This is not a slight against NASCAR, but a truth.  See, this fan was so enamored with the the sport that he used my debit card to spend some money at a NASCAR track in Michigan.  He (I'm not sure, but I'm assuming the culprit was male) then got so tired after pretending to be me all day (most days I'm exhausted after it), that he booked a room under my name.

Poor fellow must have been pooped after such a hard day.

The only way I learned of it was a timely phone call from the watchful eyes of my bank.  The major banks all have fraud monitoring departments.  They watch for unusual activity and once they saw numerous transactions in Michigan (I reside in New York) they called me to check in.

I was on vacation anyway so I figured it was them checking in on my use while on vacation.  Turns out, the use was thousands of miles away from where I was.  If not for the phone call, I don't know when I would have discovered the fraud.

The kicker?  My debit card was tucked safely in my wallet, but somehow they were still using it.  I'm tempted to open a file and start sending subpoenas out all over the country.  But I know conducting my own investigation where I've been the victim is improper.  Plus, the problem with identity theft like this is there is very little chance the offenders will be caught.  It is so easy to mask a person's identity on the internet and also easy to deny culpability.

Most identity thefts we prosecute are for people who steal licenses and credit cards and use them at stores.  State DA offices usually do not have the resources or knowledge to track interstate investigations.

Oh, and this is the second time this has happened to me.  The first was years ago when someone went to a ski resort using my card.  I guess people just like letting me pay for vacations.  But this doesn't compare to my brother who once received a tax bill from Kentucky for tens of thousands of dollars.  The problem was that he never lived in Kentucky or worked there.  It turned out an illegal immigrant had been using his name and social security number to work for years, without paying taxes.

Identity theft is rampant and only increases with technological advances.  On Friday, I'll discuss certain identity theft related crimes and how we prosecute them.

For now, despite all the bad press the big banks get, I appreciate that they are looking out for me.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Confessions of a Facebook Stalker

Friend requests, posts, pictures, tags, and likes. Have you ever thought about how much personal information you are putting online without thinking you are doing so?

As I prosecutor, I love and hate facebook. I love it because my defendants (especially the juveniles) cannot help but post incriminating pictures of themselves or leave status updates about the crime committed. I hate it because my witnesses cannot help it either and defense attorneys are checking it just as much as I am.

Facebook plays a significant role in cross-examination. I have cross-examined a defendant who denied any gang affiliation by showing him tagged photos of him flashing gang signs or a defendant who denied knowing the victim until confronted with a photo of the two of them we recovered from the internet. How about the time the defendant denied dealing drugs or ever holding a gun? Turns out there was a photo of the defendant holding a gun, smoking a joint, and flashing hundreds online.

Now for why Facebook and its progeny scares me - our willingness to forego privacy. It starts simply enough, as reported by yahoo. A "friend" requests you. You accept thinking you know him or her. Suddenly, the "friend" has access to all your friends, who your family members are, your birthday, the area you live in, what you like, and social causes you endorse. Why not just leave your social security number too? What more does a person need?

It can happen many ways. Your friend asks you for a donation to a cause he now knows you support. Turns out the cause doesn't exist after you donate. Your friend could suggest an investment opportunity like the article suggests. Your friend could find your friends and family members who are susceptible to scams through you. What about your status update about leaving for vacation? Whoever you're connected to knows your house will be unoccupied for a week. There are a million different ways a criminal can use your information and we see them everyday in the headlines.

A few common sense tips:
1) Don't accept friend requests from people you don't know.
2) Don't post anything about an event, until it's already happened.
3) Keep your privacy settings as private as possible. Only allow friends to see your pages.
4) Teach your children about privacy and the dangers of the internet. Once it's posted, it's there forever. (Hope this blog never comes back to hurt me).
5) Don't invest any money without meeting someone face to face and getting the opinion of a certified professional.
6) In case you're wondering, I do have a Facebook account. I don't label any of my family members as such though and I suggest you follow that lead.

Does anyone have stories about their privacy invaded? What are some other tips for our readers they should know about maintaining privacy online?